richlayers: (Default)
[personal profile] richlayers
I was recently discussing with a friend the merits of applying oneself. I told him he could accomplish a lot of he applied himself, but added that it would depend on what his goals were. "World dominance," was the answer. To prove my point, I am creating this guide to world dominance, so that everyone understands that any goal can be reached with the application of self.

First of all, I don’t want to suggest for a moment that this will be easy. You’ll have to apply yourself fully, every day, to achieve this end. There will hardly be time to rest between all you need to do--but remember, a good night’s sleep is vital to keep your wits sharp.

To begin: no more frivolous spending. World domination takes a lot of starting capital, so next time you feel like fast food, make yourself a sandwich instead. Video games might be fun, but you want to conquer the real world, and they won’t help with that.*

That is a fairly simple step, although it does involve some severe discipline. Just remember: you have a big goal here. It’s not to be undertaken lightly, and if you’re going to be sidetracked by a Blockbuster movie sale or the new Harry Potter book, world dominance is not for you.

It’s important to start networking NOW. Of course at this point you’re years from your dream, but networking with the right people can take a long time. I recommend buttons, bumper stickers, and a website as soon as possible. Get a street team to start putting the word out.** Make a myspace group.***

Now, you’ll need a good education. The bigger and better the education, the better off you’ll be in the long run. The population is more inclined to trust the word of a Harvard Grad than someone who went to Coffeyville Community College, let alone Podunk High. Not only do you need the credit, but you need to be smart. There is no way you can pull this off if you’re questioning your own intelligence.^

And speaking of trust, you’ll have to have an advisory council of people you can trust. I recommend that you start talking to your friends about this right away. Maybe you don’t want to reveal your plans outright, but you should definitely start probing to see who will fit into what role best.

You won’t be able to do this alone.^^ Figure out who you need, and where you need them, and you’re half way there.^^^

Lastly (for this part of things), I recommend reading up on your history. “But,” you may wonder, “why do I have to worry about this if I’m getting such a good education?” You cannot possibly know enough about previous dictatorships, assassinations, and the way the world has worked for the recorded history of the human race. Learn from THEIR mistakes; that’s what history books are for. Better to be prepared than to think, “Hmmm I suppose I should have read more about Louis XVI,” as your head rolls away from your body.

___________________________________________________________________
*Much.
**This is where that money you starting saving starts draining back out.
***Any self promotion you can do for free is good.
^If you are wondering if you’re smart enough to do this, you aren’t. Trust me.
^^At least not at first.
^^^Not really halfway but it might feel good to think of it that way.


Part II

Part III

Part IV

Date: 2007-02-08 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oneechan19.livejournal.com
May I link to this in my journal? I know several people (and one cat (don't ask)) who will find this amusing. Although the cat might take it seriously (again, don't ask).

Date: 2007-02-08 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
Sure, it's fine with me.

Stay tuned for Part II!

Date: 2007-02-08 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thedadperson.livejournal.com
Footnotes 5 and 6 do not show up within the text, as it appears on my monitor. :(

Date: 2007-02-08 11:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
Yes... it helps that they're there now....

Date: 2007-02-08 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalenel.livejournal.com
This is brilliant. ^_^

Date: 2007-02-08 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
Thanks! I was only hoping for "humorous."

Date: 2007-02-09 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fa3ryg1rl.livejournal.com
Pretty icon!!

Date: 2007-02-09 03:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fa3ryg1rl.livejournal.com
That was great! It distracted me from my sickness for a few minutes!

You've put a lot of thought into this.........

Date: 2007-02-09 04:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
Scary, huh? ;) What were you saying about me being evil....???

Date: 2007-02-09 09:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] glitter-glitz.livejournal.com
But I thought that myspace was already on its way to dominating the world.

Date: 2007-02-25 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
myspace, microsoft, google... take your pick.

world domination

Date: 2007-02-25 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oregonnerd.livejournal.com
Perhaps you should worry; this actually makes (at least retrograde) sense...even to someone who had a security clearance. Blame Lady Tairngire for me finding this...
Glenn
8]

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-02-25 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
I think the beauty of it is that it DOES make sense.... I don't see anyone doing it, because it wouldn't be easy, but it is viable.

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-02-25 06:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oregonnerd.livejournal.com
Real problem is, security services...9 of which I'm aware, NSA top dog of the pack (particularly with a monitoring scenario on domestic citizens with or without a history). At this point, I'm seriously worried about the agenda of this presidency or else the power base supporting it (I suppose latent paranoia--a primary part of PTSD--can be blamed for my including the latter). Given that suspicions that I and others have, this agenda--yours, I mean--is probably the only appropriate. But then this would be very like the organizations against the Vietnam war--and, yes, there was one of them in San Francisco that at the end turned out to consist solely of security personnel from the various services.

And I rather think that with the climactic changes which have arisen there will have to be a real reorganization of human society, and relatively soon. I may be fortunate in being over fifty and having a degenerative disease...

Robert Heinlein's Moon Is A Harsh Mistress has the organizational outline. Now all we need are the heroic organizers against various sorts of oppression--and the incidents to inspire them...

But take that as a joke.
--Glenn
8]

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-02-25 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
Like the tag says, "take this seriously at your own risk."

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-02-25 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oregonnerd.livejournal.com
Ah, well. If only for a savior...of sorts. Of course then the last one was at least somewhat a harbinger of social change according to rumor. Are you feeling any shining altruistic urges toward power?
Glenn
8]

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-02-26 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
That's the thing... would someone who decided to do this necessarily have everyone's best interests in mind? Or only their own?

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-02-27 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oregonnerd.livejournal.com
I think the main problem is that the use of force (and for that matter language as we know it) to attempt to change current sociopolitical structures...forces the organization to the kind of structure it's trying to change. You're tempting me. I tried to write something once about human development (after getting the economically useless degree in psychology) and foundered, having never outlined; something unnecessary in fiction--indeed unusable--but quite indispensable in a foray of that sort. H'm. Of course, there is a blog here where I started that; rather looks like I should revisit it.

But briefly: it seems likely to me that the social structure we know resulted from the forcible change from hunter-gatherer to primitive farming to war-based society with the impulse being generated by the destruction of the environment because of human overpopulation. Given that a society confronts another hostile one, there are three choices; fight, flee or yield (NOT the 2-valued choice generally touted). The result ends in all societies being based on the use of force. The language developed along the way has dozens of interesting implicit assumptions among 'em that if something can't be said it isn't real...I'm doing it again. I started thinking about the whole subject at about 9 years old, reaction away from a Calvinist environment...
Glenn

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-03-01 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
It seems like you're saying a lot of things in a very small space and I am not equipped to unpack all that at the moment... but it IS interesting, from the language to the politics to the social structure... In the end, I think it's a good thing that change happens, but happens slowly. The kind of person who would take over the world seems unlikely to be benevolent, so it's hard to say that the system in place is a bad one. (Although obviously it could be better.)

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-03-01 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oregonnerd.livejournal.com
Gah. Sorry. Result of having thought heavily on the subject now and again. I probably broke out in thought after having had a TS clearance...
Glenn
8]

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-03-01 04:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
Haha, it's all good.

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-03-01 05:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oregonnerd.livejournal.com
You realize that you've just impelled me. Might have been just laziness...under the username Samwise Davies on LJ I've done some writing toward ponderings on, well, philosophical matters in general (bear in mind I mean classical philosophy, which encompassed the 'soft sciences' like sociology and psychology). I'll continue. I can say that fairly bravely since I'm actually writing something that I intend to post there and a couple of other places on the net, though my primary avocation is actually poet.

I am delighted to have met you, and while my brain is somewhat functioning...there. You've got what amounts to a request to become friends. The majority--the vast majority--of writing I've done under this username is poetry or about poetry.
--Glenn

Re: world domination

Date: 2007-03-01 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richlayers.livejournal.com
I like poetry. At least, often I like poetry.

I see myself as more of a prose person but I occasionally dabble in other areas.

Profile

richlayers: (Default)
richlayers

September 2010

S M T W T F S
    1234
56 7 8 9 1011
12 131415 1617 18
19 202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 20th, 2026 04:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios